Shahnameh is the most prominent epic work of Persian language and literature and one of the literary masterpieces of Iran and the world. Correction, description, critique and analysis of Shahnameh is one of the fields of study of Persian language and literature researchers. There have been many and valuable efforts in the field of correction of the Shahnameh text and its description. According to the Shahnameh researchers, the correction of the Shahnameh by Jalal Khaleghi Motlagh, along with the precise recording of other manuscripts in the footnote, is a complete and perfect correction in this filed. In addition to this correction, Shahnameh's photographic prints, scholars' access to other corrections of the Shahnameh, as well as commentaries on the Shahnameh are very helpful in opening up some difficulties. In the light of the foregoing efforts of the Shahnameh researchers, in this study i will indicate the suggestion to record and to give a meaning of the verse from the story of Forud based on San. Joseph's version, which he did not have this verse at the time of correcting and describing the Shahnameh. The author will attempt to review the correctors and commentators opinion about the so called verse and also by referring to manuscripts text, in-text evidences of the Shahnameh, out-text evidences of contemporary and near-Shahnameh texts and the sequence of verses in the context of the story propose their suggestion based on manuscripts and consequently the meaning and sense of the verse with the help of recordings and obtained evidences.

In this article, the writers make a distinction between two types of text, open text and closed text. While the latter has a fixed and limited meaning, fixed signifiers and signifieds, with the signs always referring the reader to a fixed world, the former has the potential to be loaded with various meanings. To explicate the two types of text and the factors that make a text open, the writers draw on the views of great thinkers such as Rolan Barthes, Wolfgang Izer, Jacques Derrida and Carl Gustav Yung. The purpose of the article is to show how a familiarity with the western interpretations of Hermeneutics can affect our appreciation of Persian literature.

Nizami’, s Khamseh is the poems has been repeatedly copied in the illustrated and non-illustrated forms during the time. Illustrated manuscripts have in addition poems, the meaning concepts of illustration and it is because of being relation among poems and its illustrations. This paper, introduce illustrations of Haft Peikar of Nizami’, s Khamseh’, s manuscripts by Descriptive-analytical method. They are as following, university of Tehran’, s manuscript-code 5179, Shahid Motahhari’, s-code 400, America Library of Congress, Kakh Golestan-code 1951, Islamic Consultative Assembly-code 930, National library-code5-15275 of N. L. digital, National library-code 3058256 of N. L. digital. Due to the relation between illustration and poems, being aware of the number as well as the subject of illustrations and the main focus of their narrative, is important for later research in this field. The paper says that in the above manuscripts, Bahram Gour is the main focus of the narrative and most frequently revolves around his presence in seven domes while the painter is not completely bound to the text.

In this paper one of the main forms of textualization will be represented; little known, in our opinion, first by foreign language specialists (linguists or literary) in Iran and marginalized, even absent, from the educational applications in language and literature courses in the Iranian universities.After an overview of the types of texts, we will try to develop the idea that concerns us here, namely the study of argumentative type in two ways: firstly the epistemological concept of argumentation and then the organization of the argumentative text. French: Le texte argumentatif et la typologie de textesResume Cet article aura comme but de representer l’une des formes principales de textualisation, peu connue, a notre avis, d’abord par les specialistes des langues etrangeres (linguiste ou litteraire) en Iran et marginalisee, et meme absente, par consequent, des applications pedagogiques dans les cours de langue et litterature au milieu universitaire iranien.Apres un apercu general de la typologie des textes, nous avons essaye de mettre au point l’idee qui nous preoccupe ici, a savoir l’etude du type argumentatif sur deux plans: d’abord plan epistemologique de la notion d’argumentation et ensuite plan organisationnel du texte argumentatif.keywords: Typologie de textes, Argumentation, Discours Argumentatif, Organisation de texte, Categories de la Langue

One of the most important information security techniques is the hiding of information. Steganography is the art and science of hiding information in the cover of data (in the form of text, image, video, or audio) such that it does not arise any suspicions, and is difficult or even impossible to discover. This paper presents a method for steganography in the form of text which uses the methods of text justifying in typing editors. The method presented in this paper is able to hide information better than some of previous algorithms in this field. This algorithm is resistant to various forms of attack such as visual, structural and statistical attacks. Another important capability of this method is that it can be used to send printed information.

The examination and study ofIbnAbi al-Hadid’, s view about Ghadir and clear text on the succession of Imam Ali in his most significant work, the description of Nahj al-Balaghah is the "main issue" of this paper, which has been carried out in a descriptive and analytical method. The hypothesis of this study is that even though IbnAbi al-Hadid does not consider the Ghadir event as a clear text for the caliphate of Ali, he emphasizes its importance and mentions important examples of the celebration of Ghadir in his work, emphasizing the type of belief of the Imamiyah in those celebrations. Based on the findings of this study, IbnAbi al-HadidMu’, tazili accepts the event of Ghadir and the praise of the Messenger of God (Prophet Mohammad) from Ali and even mentions the views of the Imamiyahscholars in the context of the text on the caliphate of ImamAli with his tolerance. He also mentions the prayers of the Prophet for Ali in Ghadir. In his work, he has also rejected the celebrations of Shias on the anniversary of GhadirKhum and its philosophy, a topic that was less discussed in non-Imamyah works before the Mongol invasion. He does not accept or interpret the narratives that are consideredclear text on the Imamate of Imam Ali.